'Climate change scientists' are being left out in the cold after being exposed as charlatans, as the man-made climate change con goes big time. The media can't get enough gates, reporting every twist and turn of the global warming scandal. Does the Orange Party feel sorry for those poor AGW 'scientists' and their pals? Not a bit of it.
The Climategate scandal was bad enough. Then the Floodgates opened with Glaciergate, Amazongate, Disastergate, Chinagate. Poor old Thermometergate hardly got a look in.
The casualty has been the honourable reputation of real scientists, slogging away with real research.
At the heart lies flawed scientific methodology, data manipulated to fit in with preconceived politics, usual rules over peer review abandoned and a climate change club which doesn't welcome robust scientific challenge or anyone who doesn't fit into their cosy eco-world.
The MSM is on the case. Hardly a week goes by without the discredited 'science' dealt another blow. Today's diet comes from The Times and Guardian, leaving the BBC and 'climate change' minister, Miliband, out in the cold, along with magazines Newsweek and Nature.
It's a year since the Orange Party was forced to issue a weather warning to 'beware the climate change conmen'. Man-made global warming is a global con to prop up the Met Office money-making machine and fuel carbon trading greed.
Not prepared to be bullied by eco-fundamentalists, the Orange Party has long believed the man-made global warming myth was an elaborate money-spinning hoax. The 'world's leading climate scientists' are more dedicated to promoting an alarmist political agenda than scientific research.
Man-made pollution and man-made greed are the culprits, not poor souls forced to read by dim energy-saving light bulbs. As the Wall Street Journal says: Follow the money.
The blogosphere has been on the ball since the ice ages. But kick starting credit goes to an unlikely source - BBC regional TV weatherman Hudson, who in October 2009 dared to ask: What happened to global warming? Pointing to the fact that "the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998."
Auntie got her thermal knickers in a twist. Climategate was born, picked up in the US by Fox. Real environmental scientists took up the cudgels.
Predictions were based on dodgy, discredited climate change computer models. Political wannabes had seized on the latest craze to jump on a greenwash bandwagon. Climate change fuelled fear. A new weapon in a politician arsenal.
The Climategate scandal was a breath of fresh air, as embarrassing leaked emails from the university of East Anglia climate research unit (CRU) revealed that 'climate' scientists 'hid' flaws in key global warming data. But that was the tip of the iceberg.
Hard on the heels came Glaciergate with 'scientists' accused of 'scientific fraud', after it was revealed a prediction in an IPCC report that the Himalayan glaciers could all disappear by 2035 was wildly exaggerated and based on a casual remark by a single Indian scientist.
To add insult to injury, Amazongate came along, with Delingpole reporting: "Not content with having lied to us about shrinking glaciers, increasing hurricanes, and rising sea levels, the IPCC’s latest assessment report also told us a complete load of porkies about the danger posed by climate change to the Amazon rainforest."
All roads lead back to back to CRU's Climategate and the IPCC, with the UN's climate change panel caught out making unfounded claims, forcing an embarrassing admission of false predictions on the glacier meltdown.
Chinagate debunked the link between humans and global warming (AGW). Rising temperatures in China were due to the warming effects of big cities rather than global climate changes.
And spare a thought for Thermometergate, with only one reporting thermometer north of 65 degrees in freezing Canada. Thermometers in Siberia? Not a lot.
Hurricanegate? A disaster. 'The dam is cracking', according to the BBC's Neill, laying bare the IPCC mess.
AGW 'scientists' deliberately set out to trick and mislead. How long will it take for the sheer skullduggery of the climate change zealots to be laid to rest, along with the whole 'man-made global warming' scam?
Data was skewed to fit in with a half-baked political agenda, throwing out facts which did not support an ideological stance. Science became only what AGW zealots deemed is science. Truth only that which which fitted into a narrow minded view of the complexities of nature's long rich cycles.
The public has been deliberately taken for a ride on the AGW eco-bus, when brutal reality is staring them in the face but hard to swallow. Pollution and greed are the culprits.
"Recent controversies over scientific data have not undermined efforts to tackle global warming," minister Miliband insisted, telling the BBC it would be "profoundly irresponsible" to use one "mistake" as an excuse not to act.
Man-made global warming has lost its popular appeal but some politicians still go with the flow. Miliband reckons it would be "devastating for future generations" to misinterpret them. Damaging sure, for someone desperate to hang on to a vast empire of the sun and the grand "department of energy and climate change."
The chickens of the "greatest scandal in modern science" have finally come home to roost.