Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Climategate II-A Feeble Fightback

So-called 'climate change scientists' and self-appointed cheerleaders of the AGW con are staging a feeble fightback with a bit of dodgy science of their own, after leaked e-mails showing up the sham of the man-made global warming myth sent shivers down the spines of the greenwash zealots.

Slammed as 'the greatest scandal in modern science', now "three UK groups studying climate change have issued an unprecedented statement about the dangers of failing to cut emissions of greenhouse gases", reports the BBC with glee.

Usual suspects, The Royal Society, Met Office, and Natural Environment Research Council say the science (sic) underpinning climate change is "more alarming than ever".

And to back up the Climategate sham, they say the 2007 UK floods were "consistent with emerging patterns".

Nothing to do with a woeful lack of investment in storm drains. Nothing to do with building houses on flood plains. Nothing to do with concreting over huge tracts of land. Nah. Blame it on man-made global warming. So much easier.

A damning string of emails hacked from one of the world's top climate research centres at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) confirmed that the entire shoddy science of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a scam.

About 1,000 e-mails and more than 3,000 private documents relating to climate change showed up attempts to prevent the release of scientific data, destroy material and rig scientific data to make out humans are causing global warming.

Some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Sceptics claim this is 'the final nail in the coffin' of man-made global warming theory. Even evergreen George Monbiot, now feels he's wasted years of his life "promoting a bogus discipline".

The publication of hacked e-mails has prompted one key US Republican senator to call for an investigation into the research. James Inhofe told the Washington Times, he would probe whether the IPCC "cooked the science to make this thing look as if the science was settled, when all the time of course we knew it was not."

Here former chancellor, Nigel Lawson, has called for an inquiry into the global warming scandal.

The Orange Party has long believed the man-made global warming myth is an elaborate money-spinning hoax. The 'world's leading climate scientists' are more dedicated to promoting an alarmist political agenda than scientific research.

At the centre of the Climategate scam is the international body that claims to be the world authority on climate change – the UN-sponsored IPCC.

Any shred of credibility left in the IPCC and its lackeys in the CRU, Met Office and BBC has been torn to shreds.

Opinion polls show the public doesn't buy into the hype of man-made climate change. Advertising watchdogs are investigating a scary £6m government 'climate change' ad over claims it's 'misleading and too "scary" for children'.

The government's climate change figures have been branded 'misleading' by the government's own UK Statistics Authority.

A BBC ‘climate reporter’ and regional TV weatherman, Paul Hudson, ruffled a few feathers with the audacity to ask: What happened to global warming? Pointing to the fact that "the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998."

These so-called "scientists" deliberately set out to trick and mislead. They skewed the data to fit in with a half-baked political agenda. Throwing out facts which did not support an ideological stance.

Science is only what AGW zealots deem is science. Truth only that which which fits into a narrow minded view of the complexities of nature's long rich cycles. The public has been deliberately taken for a ride on the anthropogenic global warming scam when the brutal reality is staring them in the face but more difficult to stomach. Pollution and greed are the culprits.

Pollution and greed which has seen forests wiped out and natives booted out to fuel the West's insatiable demand for cheap beef and palm oil.

Pollution and greed which has led to Far East factories belching out poison to satisfy the craving for cheap goods. Pollution and greed which forces poor souls to eek out a living on the stench of Third World rubbish tips.

Pollution and greed which has led to factories and public utilities given a slap on the wrist for polluting rivers, fields and water courses.

These are the real culprits. Not the hapless soul who is forced to read by a dim 'energy saving' light bulb.

The real scandal is the way dodgy science is being used to prop up politicians, carbon traders and taxpayer funded 'research centres', riding on the back of the scam to make a quick buck.


Stepney said...


Maturecheese said...

Alas, even after the revelations of the hacked e-mails,or any other evidence to the contrary that arises, the NWO merchants will spin and bully and force their agenda through. Although resistance is laudable it is, unfortunately, futile.

Ahrvid Engholm said...


The first few jokes in this file are by ahrvid@hotmail.com. Feel free to add your own and share the fun with others!

Question: How many Climategate deniers does it take to change a light bulb? (Q repeated for every answer)

What light bulb? The EU has banned them for environmental reasons.

None. Media prefers to stumble around in the dark.

Thirty. Because when you’ve done you need a whole platoon to dig trenches and put up barbed wire to defend your position to the very last man.

2501. That’s the number in the Intergovernmental Panel of Light-bulb Change. 2451 of them are only formally members and couldn’t care less, though everyone flies their jet planes to expensive international conferences to get pissed and allow their names to be used in several thousand pages thick reports, sure to lay substantial areas of forests barren. There are about 50 that sit and cherry-pick the light bulbs that are suited for “the cause”. Of these only about a dozen check that the correct light bulb – and only the correct light bulb – is selected. Finally Al Gore climbs to the very top of the ladder and make sure that everything becomes totally screwed up.

What a bloody bickering about light bulbs! We will not change light bulbs. The light-bulb science is settled once and for all. You’re only a gang of conspiracy theorists that deny the Holocaust, think the US Government blew up the Twin Towers and see Flying Saucers in the sky.

None. because you can use the trick of hiding the decline in luminosity.

What’s a ”light bulb”? We only have camp fires, where we come from, and are almost freezing to death. Oh, how we long for Medieval times! It’s supposed to have been a Warm Period then.

It will be impossible to change any light bulbs. You see, even if we here on the BBC are about 23 000 employees, every single one of us is fully occupied with making new programmes where we repeat the same old message about “climate change”, day out and day in. That’s public service TV for you!

Changing a light bulb, you said? I’m from the government and I’m here to help you. Of course you have to pay the light-bulb tax, the electricity tax and of course the CO2 tax, not to forget the climate-change fee, the environment duty and the fossil-fuel charge. What? Well, mortgage your house, for heaven’s sake! Think of the poor panda bears, please. First we must make sure that the light bulb complies with regulation 4.71, paragraph B) in sub section…

To: Phil@cru.co.uk
Subject: Annoying idiot wants scientific openness
Howdy amigo!
I got this outrageous E-mail by some idiot that wants to check our light-bulb figures. If I see him I promise you I'll beat the crap out of him. Suggest that you immediately delete everything. Chris will do the same. We can't have others coming and checking our light bulbs. Scientific scrutiny and freedom of information in my ass! I propose that we gang up and oust this annoying man from everything. BTW, I attached the latest version of our program code, with should fix the travesty about that the increase simply hasn't happened.
Ps. Send the money in chunks below 10 000 dollars, so authorities won't find them, though I know that's a heck of a job for the 100 billion of tax-payer's money we have gotten so far.